Intelligence
Assessment of Tier-1 infrastructure and environmental platforms. Focus on Operational Alpha and Regulatory Moats.
ERM is the world's largest specialist sustainability consultancy and the primary "pure-play" benchmark for the sector. Under KKR majority ownership (acquired in 2021 at a ~$2.7B valuation), ERM has transitioned from a traditional EHS firm into a strategic advisor integrating C-suite ESG transformation with boots-on-the-ground technical delivery across 40+ countries and 8,000+ professionals.
Its competitive advantage is the "Boots-to-Boardroom" model — ensuring boardroom-level sustainability commitments are technically feasible and verifiable at the asset level. This bifurcated model captures both high-margin strategy mandates from CSOs and CFOs, and high-volume technical remediation, forensics, and engineering work from EHS and Operations directors.
"ERM wins by providing global consistency to multinationals — combining boardroom-level climate strategy with on-the-ground technical execution in a way that creates a defensive moat against strategy-only boutiques and generalist engineering firms." — Gaya Capital Research
FY25 gross revenue reached $1.413B, up from $1.323B in 2023. Revenue quality is shifting positively: long-term MSAs and sticky compliance-driven work now drive a larger share versus project-based boutique exposure. ERM targets firm-wide billable utilization of 75–85%, with higher-margin strategy mandates using senior-heavy staffing and lower-leverage technical remediation teams providing volume.
Total reported turnover for FY25 was approximately 19.9% — a known pressure point, particularly in Asia-Pacific at 30.2%, creating an ongoing talent retention imperative. KKR's ownership alongside 580 ERM partners as minority investors provides a structural alignment mechanism, but managing the "Green Skills Gap" remains a strategic constraint on scaling.
| Peer Group | Their Arena | ERM's Structural Edge |
|---|---|---|
| Big Four (Deloitte, PwC) | ESG reporting & digital transformation | Technical bedrock in remediation/engineering that Big Four cannot replicate; C-suite access plus field execution |
| Engineering Hybrids (WSP, Tetra Tech) | Large-scale infrastructure contracts | "Pure-play" sustainability brand creates premium pricing; strategy access Big Four has but engineered firms lack |
| Specialist Implementers (SLR, RSK) | Boutique agility and sector focus | Global scale enables Fortune 100 MSAs that boutiques cannot operationally staff; consistent delivery across jurisdictions |
APTIM is a $1.2 billion environmental engineering and infrastructure platform carved out from CB&I by Veritas Capital in 2017 for $755M. The company has since delivered 60% revenue growth (8% CAGR) driven by organic expansion in PFAS remediation, coastal resilience, and federal program management — validating the Veritas thesis of a compliance-driven, counter-cyclical asset with government revenue concentration of an estimated 65–80% of total revenue.
APTIM's #1 ENR ranking in Site Assessment & Compliance for three consecutive years is independently verifiable proof of technical execution quality. The company's proprietary Flask to Field™ PFAS methodology and access to federal contract vehicles including OASIS+, a $1.4B DOE Strategic Petroleum Reserve contract, and a $1.5B USAF IDIQ represent structural competitive barriers that are difficult for new entrants to replicate on a multi-year basis.
"APTIM is a defensible mid-tier environmental services platform positioned in high-growth end markets that benefit from regulatory tailwinds largely insulated from political cycles." — Gaya Capital Research
For PE sponsors, the durability of APTIM's revenue drivers under the current administration is the primary underwriting question. Gaya Capital's risk-adjusted analysis confirms that the core thesis is structurally protected:
| Revenue Driver | Political Risk | Risk-Adjusted View |
|---|---|---|
| PFAS Remediation (~$6M, growing) | MEDIUM | State standards (CA 10ppt, NY 10ppt, MI, NJ) create a "California Effect" floor even if federal MCLs are weakened. DoD PFAS funded at ~$1.2B/yr — bipartisan Congressional mandate protecting military families. |
| IIJA (est. $50–100M, ramping) | LOW | Bipartisan passage (19 Senate R's + 13 House R's). Already-appropriated mandatory spending; rescission requires 218 House votes. Republican states (TX, FL, LA) protecting their IIJA allocations. |
| IRA-Linked Programs | MEDIUM-HIGH | Zero Republican votes at passage creates no political ownership. Budget pressure via DOGE makes IRA a target. APTIM should stress-test IRA-dependent revenue in diligence. |
| Core Federal IDIQs (DoD/DOE) | LOW | Non-discretionary compliance mandates. 11-year client retention on groundwater remediation contracts validates stickiness. Base defense budget of $850B makes PFAS funding (0.14%) politically indefensible to cut. |
| Scenario | Exit Route | Valuation Range | IRR Estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Case | Strategic sale to Jacobs, AECOM, Tetra Tech, or Stantec seeking federal capabilities and PFAS expertise | $1.2–$1.6B (10–12x EBITDA) | 6–10% IRR |
| Secondary | PE-to-PE secondary transaction — environmental services PE multiples at 20.9x EV/EBITDA median in 2025 | $1.4–$1.8B | 8–12% IRR |
| Upside | PFAS acceleration + IIJA peak deployment (2026–2028); platform re-rating on recurring revenue mix improvement | $1.6–$2.0B | 12–15% IRR |
McDonnell
Burns & McDonnell is a $7.4 billion titan in the U.S. infrastructure market — 100% employee-owned via ESOP — built on a vertically integrated "Design-Build" engine that captures the entire project lifecycle from advisory through EPC. Its model is explicitly designed to eliminate the margin leakage that occurs when design and construction are separated, positioning BMcD as a single point of accountability for clients executing large-scale capital programs.
BMcD's "wedge" strategy is its most defensible competitive mechanism: the firm leverages funding-enabled advisory (SRF financing support, capital program management) to embed itself upstream in the client relationship, then secures downstream design and construction scope that would otherwise be competed. This model is particularly effective in the utility sector, where BMcD acts as a structural extension of client staff through long-term overflow MSAs — exploiting the industry-wide internal staffing constraints that are forcing utilities to outsource technical work at scale.
| Metric | BMcD Position | Strategic Significance |
|---|---|---|
| ENR Top Design Firms | #7 Overall (2025) | Top-tier scale enabling Fortune 500 and federal program access inaccessible to mid-market peers |
| Workforce | 14,500+ Employees · 77 Offices | Geographic density enables rapid mobilization; office presence in all major U.S. markets |
| Active Projects | 22,000+ Concurrent | Project volume generates institutional intelligence and repeat client relationships at scale |
| Ownership Model | 100% ESOP | No external shareholder pressure; reinvestment-first culture compounding equity value internally |
| Revenue Model | Vertically Integrated Design-Build | Captures 100% of project lifecycle margin vs. design-only firms that cede construction fees |
Atwell is one of the most compelling PE-backed infrastructure services platforms in the country — ascending from a regional Midwest surveying firm to ENR Top 70 with $424.7M in confirmed 2024 revenue and management-guided targets exceeding $500M in 2025, representing 30%+ year-over-year growth. Under Quad-C Management since 2021, Atwell has executed 20+ acquisitions and built a 2,100+ person workforce across 50+ offices in virtually every major U.S. growth corridor.
The firm occupies the "mid-market sweet spot" — large enough to hold MSAs with major utilities and secure complex federal and municipal programs, yet agile enough to serve private developers and IPPs that the global giants systematically underprice. Revenue per employee benchmarks at $250K+ (2024), approaching the $250–300K range achieved by top-quartile advisory-heavy AEC firms.
"Atwell's revenue leads construction cycles by 12–36 months, providing forward visibility and avoiding the capital intensity and margin compression of construction execution. This is front-end professional services at its most defensible." — Gaya Capital Research
| Metric | Data Point | Strategic Read |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Trajectory | $379M (2023) → $424.7M (2024) → $500M+ (2025E) | Sustained double-digit growth for 15+ consecutive years — structural, not cyclical |
| M&A Velocity | 5 acquisitions in 2025 · 4 in 2024 · 20+ since 2021 | Morrissey Goodale Best M&A Post-Transaction Performance Award validates playbook repeatability |
| Credit Facility | $200M senior revolver (BofA-led, Jan 2024) | TD Bank, U.S. Bank, Old National Bank syndicate; institutional debt capacity for continued buy-and-build |
| Hart & Hickman (2024) | Environmental consulting: Phase I/II ESAs, brownfield redevelopment | Enables cross-sell of environmental diligence to industrial and real estate client base |
| Manhard Integration | Mid-market civil engineering competitor | Validates ability to absorb and cross-sell utility-grade power services to land developers |
Ulteig is a preeminent utility-centric infrastructure platform with 1,500+ employee-owners managing 3,200+ annual projects across its four "Lifeline Sectors": Power, Renewables, Transportation, and Water. Headquartered in Fargo, North Dakota with 16 offices and a presence in 48 states — plus a recently established Costa Rica presence — Ulteig has climbed 100 ENR positions over five years to reach the Top 100 (#85 Pure Firm ranking, 2025).
The investment thesis is built on four pillars: structural revenue resilience (mandatory utility CapEx and federal grant-funded programs); technical barriers to entry (interconnection engineering, FAA Part 139 compliance, integrated ROW acquisition — each requiring years of institutional expertise); public-sector embeddedness (recurring MSA relationships with municipalities and utilities that are effectively never re-competed); and proprietary technology IP (PathFinder grid decision engine, PinPoint transportation planning tool).
"When a PE sponsor buys Ulteig, they are buying time to market. A firm that can design a transmission line and secure the land for it is infinitely more valuable than a firm that only does the design." — Gaya Capital Research
Ulteig's 100% ESOP ownership creates a structural condition for a PE-sponsored liquidity event as: (1) employee-owners approach retirement ages with concentrated equity; (2) external capital requirements for continued M&A (four acquisitions since 2019) exceed ESOP financing capacity; and (3) the management team — led by CEO Doug Jaeger (former Xcel Energy executive) and a professionalized board including technology veteran Bhupinder Singh (former Bentley Systems) — seeks an institutional growth partner.
| Segment | ENR / Market Position | Structural Demand Driver |
|---|---|---|
| Power & Renewables | Top 20 Power Firms nationally · 70% of backlog | MISO $30B+ Tranche 1 transmission projects; grid modernization and IBR integration |
| Transportation / Aviation | Strong DOT penetration; FAA Part 139 specialist | IIJA $110B roads/bridges; FAA AIP grant cycles; recurring airport MSA recurrence |
| Water & Climate | Fargo-Moorhead $3.2B P3 project lead | IIJA $55B water; Clean Water Act NPDES compliance; first-in-class P3 delivery experience |
Westwood Professional Services has climbed ENR's Top 500 from #368 in 2018 to #77 in 2025 — a trajectory driven by disciplined M&A (9+ acquisitions), organic growth exceeding 30% year-over-year in 2024, and exceptional positioning across four structural growth verticals. The firm holds national rankings of #3 Wind Design, #5 Solar Design, #6 Battery Storage, and #21 Power Design — a multi-category technical leadership profile that distinguishes Westwood from scale-aggregators and confirms genuine engineering depth.
In August 2024, Blackstone Energy Transition Partners (BETP IV) acquired a majority stake, positioning Westwood as the front-end engineering design (FEED) layer for an integrated infrastructure ecosystem alongside high-voltage insulator manufacturer Sediver and backup power provider Trystar. Blackstone's $5.6B BETP IV fund provides preferred access to energy transition deal flow that no independent mid-market AEC firm can replicate.
"Westwood has evolved from a regional surveying firm into a national infrastructure platform across four growth cycles of increasing complexity — service lines, geography, service tier. This is a materially different firm from the one Endurance Partners backed in 2019." — Gaya Capital Research
| Metric | Data Point | Strategic Read |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Trajectory | ~$200M (2019) → ~$822M (2026E) | ~4x revenue growth in 7 years; organic 30%+ YoY in 2024 confirms M&A is additive, not compensatory |
| ENR Trajectory | #368 (2018) → #77 (2025) | 291-position climb; multi-category rankings confirm technical quality, not just scale acquisition |
| M&A Capability | 9+ acquisitions · Chief Acquisition Officer + Director of M&A | Institutionalized M&A function; Aaron Tippie + Trevor Garfield (ex-EIG/Juniper Capital) — institutional deal DNA |
| Blackstone Ecosystem | BETP IV · Sediver · Trystar · Alliance Technical Group | Portfolio company synergies provide preferred access to energy transition deal flow globally |
| Balzer (Dec 2024) | Mid-Atlantic commercial/residential land development | Countercyclical buffer to renewable energy fee variability; geographic diversification |
SCS Engineers is one of the most defensively positioned platform assets in U.S. environmental engineering — reporting $493M in 2023 revenue (12% YoY growth) driven by a 55-year history of non-discretionary solid waste compliance. The firm is #1 nationally in ENR Solid Waste and ranked #51 overall on ENR's Top 200 Environmental Firms. Unlike the majority of environmental consultancies, SCS operates integrated lifecycle services spanning permitting, construction (RNG facilities, leachate treatment), and long-term OM&M at 650+ landfills — creating annuity-like cash flow highly attractive to PE sponsors.
Under CEO Doug Doerr (30-year SCS veteran, succeeded long-time leader Jim Walsh in January 2024), the firm is executing its 2022 Strategic Plan across four structural tailwinds: PFAS remediation mandates, RNG buildout, federal infrastructure investment, and digital transformation via its proprietary technology platform. SCS is 100% employee-owned (ESOP since 1986) and structured as an S-Corp ESOP — generating no federal income tax on ESOP-attributable earnings, creating structural financial advantages that have compounded technical moat investment over decades.
"SCS is the only environmental firm in the United States with both the technical specialization in solid waste and the scale to deliver integrated lifecycle services across permitting, construction, and multi-decade OM&M." — Gaya Capital Research
The April 2024 EPA CERCLA designation of PFOA/PFOS as hazardous substances is the single most significant regulatory event in SCS's addressable market in decades. The impact is multi-dimensional:
| Platform | Function | Revenue Model |
|---|---|---|
| SCS RMC® | Real-time remote monitoring and control of LFG extraction, leachate collection, and groundwater monitoring networks; ML anomaly detection; automated compliance reports | Recurring monthly subscription per facility. Deployed at 650+ OM&M landfill base — productization of existing relationships |
| SCSeTools® | Environmental data management for groundwater, leachate chemistry, and LFG wellfield data; real-time compliance health checks | SaaS licensing — high switching costs once integrated into client compliance workflows |
| Drone + LIDAR | Methane-sensing LIDAR, thermal imagery, 360° cameras for fugitive emissions detection and LFG wellfield balance across landfill surfaces | Service fee with hardware amortization; replaces manual quarterly surveys at higher margin |
| Autonomous Robotics | Boston Dynamics Spot deployment for methane monitoring in challenging terrain — recently unveiled capability | Early-stage; positions SCS ahead of EPA's proposed enhanced methane monitoring rules requiring automated solutions |
| Risk Factor | Severity | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| ESOP Culture Transition | HIGH | Departure of senior engineers with deep client relationships is the most significant downside scenario. Management equity rollover and broad employee incentive plan are essential mitigants. Preserve ESOP-like economic participation to retain culture. |
| S-Corp Tax Advantage Loss | MEDIUM | 3–5% effective margin reduction on C-Corp conversion. Sophisticated deal structure (pass-through entity, partial ESOP continuation) can partially preserve tax efficiency. |
| PFAS Regulatory Durability | MEDIUM | CERCLA designation faces industry legal challenges. Ulteig-style state regulation floor likely to protect core demand. SCS's FOAM-X IP is valuable regardless of regulatory pace. |
| IRA Rollback (RNG Credits) | MEDIUM | 45Z clean fuel credits are the primary RNG economics driver. Partial IRA rollback would reduce new project economics but not cancel existing projects mid-construction. State mandates (CA SB 1383) provide independent demand floor. |